Does your Case Meet the Definition of Malpractice

Post 13 of 27

Medical negligence is a serious issue that is being debated across the world. Most countries have their own rules regarding malpractice. However, there are certain aspects that need to be analyzed in order to see if a case falls under the definition of malpractice. Before pouring money into a lawyer’s pocket you need to do some research and see if you would stand a chance during a law suit. Today we are going to present a couple of factors that will help you understand what medical negligence is.

Legal definition

The legal definition of malpractice refers to negligence or misconduct by a professional person that leads to the failure to meet the standard of care or conduct that is recognized by certain authorities. This can apply to various fields such as accounting, law, medicine and so on. In the medical world a professional negligence often leads to physical injuries or mental and emotional damage. Most hospitals are insured against malpractice claims but even if they weren’t, winning such a law suit is very difficult as the case has to follow a certain pattern.

Professional duty

In order for a case to fall under the definition of malpractice it needs to have a solid foundation. On that matter you need to establish whether or not there was an owe of duty. In order for a person to be responsible for the injuries caused to another person he must owe a duty of care to the injured person. You need to make sure that the liable person is a healthcare provider and that the injured person was under his or her care. Each state has different laws regarding the health care providers who are liable for malpractice and before starting a law suit you need to check the civil code.

Standard of care

Malpractice can often be interpreted according to a country’s standard of care. After you determine the standard of care you will need excerpt testimony is order to prove that the standard was not met under certain circumstances. Keep in mind that some states use a regional standard while other use a national one.

Breach of duty

The breach of duty is often subjective and depends on the standard of care. The expert testimony is very important in establishing whether or not there was a breach of duty. The breach must be the reason that caused the injury otherwise it will be considered irrelevant to your case. Furthermore be prepared to battle against other expert testimonies which will be used in order to negate yours. When a law suit reaches this point, the lawyers abilities are vital in order to draw the jury by your side.

Difference between injuries and damages

In order to define malpractice you need to have evidence not just of injuries but also of damage that has been made due to the breach of duty. The damages can be physical, mental or emotional.